Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.65 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, with a 92.3 score against 78.5. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a incredibly older and a little heavier phone than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, but Samsung managed to build it a bit thinner anyway. Both phones we compare here work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has the previous 11 version while Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has Android 12.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a way better performance than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion. They have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, although it has a just a bit worse pixel quantity per inch of screen, a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bit smaller display.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion also has a much higher video resolution, a way higher resolution camera in the back and a way larger back camera sensor taking much better quality pictures.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because it has 256 GB internal memory. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 4400mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.