Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.65 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a lot better than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, with a 94.6 score against 78.5. Even though Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is older and notably heavier than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, it's construction is still just a little bit thinner. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the previous 11 version while Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has Android 12.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a little smaller screen and a little bit lower 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per display inch.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because it has more internal storage. Galaxy Z Fold 2 has just a bit better battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4400mAh.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy Z Fold 2, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion also has a way better 7680x4320 video definition, a camera in the back with way more mega pixels and a larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.