Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.65 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 is much better than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, getting a 90.6 score against 78.5. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Fold 3 has the previous 11 version while Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has Android 12. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 is an older and noticeably heavier phone than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, but Samsung could make it somewhat thinner anyway.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a much powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a quite smaller display and a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a little bit higher pixel quantity per inch in the display.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because it has 256 GB internal storage. Galaxy Z Fold 3's battery duration is just as good as Motorola Edge 30 Fusion's battery life. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion captures greater pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a camera with a much higher resolution and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better images in low light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.