Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 6.64 x 3.04 x 0.41 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold | Armor gray, Lightning black and Star silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.65 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4720mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 is better than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, having an 86.6 score against 78.5. Both phones in this comparison review use Android operating system, but Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has the previous 10 version while Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has Android 12. Even though Xiaomi Black Shark 3 is better than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, it must be told that it is also a notably older, incredibly heavier and way thicker cellphone.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion also counts with a just a little better pixels number per inch in the display.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 features a very superior performance than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion. They have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion shoots slightly better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because although it has a lot worse resolution back-facing camera, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion also counts with a way higher 7680x4320 video definition and a larger back camera sensor capturing higher quality photographs.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion and Xiaomi Black Shark 3 count with similar storage to install games and applications, both of them have exactly the same internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has just a little better battery life than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because it has 4720mAh of battery capacity against 4400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.