Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 90.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold | Blasting black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 484 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.65 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a general score of 90.1, which is better than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion's score of 78.5. These devices use Android OS, but Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has 10 version while Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has Android 12. Although it's the best in this comparison review, Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is an a lot older, noticeably heavier and incredibly thicker cellphone than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a much better performing processor than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion. They have 8 cores and the same RAM memory amount. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, although it has a little smaller screen, a lot lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit lower amount of pixels per inch of screen.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has much more storage for games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because it has 256 GB internal memory. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion shoots clearer photos and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although it has a camera in the back with a much lower 50 MP resolution, and they both have the same aperture, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion also counts with a way higher 7680x4320 video definition and a bigger sensor providing a better image quality.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.