Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.65 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a global score of 78.5, which is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9's overall score of 76.6. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a more recent 12 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has Android 10, so it provides the user some nice extra features. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion body is notably newer, somewhat thinner and lighter than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a much better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion also has a quite better pixel density and a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a very superior processing power than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has 5 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 cores.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion takes much better videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion also has a lot higher video definition, a much bigger sensor and a better resolution back camera. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has just a bit bigger storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with a little better battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity against 4400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.