Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.65 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a score of 81.1, which is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion's overall score of 78.5. Both phones we are comparing come with Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has an older 10 version while Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has Android 12 version. Despite being the best phone in our current comparison, it must be told that it's also an a lot older, thicker and somewhat heavier phone.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400px resolution, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion also counts with a just a little better pixel density. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 512 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has an extremely better CPU than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a lot worse 50 mega-pixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better images and video in poorly lited environments, a lot better video quality and a larger sensor providing a better image quality.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with just a little bit longer battery life than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity instead of 4400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.