Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.5 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.65 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, having a general score of 79 against 78.5. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is a better phone than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, we must tell that it is also a incredibly older, somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker phone. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has the older 11 version and Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has Android 12 version.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a lot better performance than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400px resolution, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion also counts with a quite greater display pixels density.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion also has a camera in the back with more mega-pixels, a way bigger camera sensor which provides a way better image and video quality and a much higher 7680x4320 video quality.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a quite bigger memory to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a bit superior battery life than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because it has a 14% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.