Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-09-08 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Aqua Foam, Black Onyx, Ice Palace and Very Peri | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 418 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4020mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo is slightly better than Google Pixel 3, getting a overall score of 83.1 against 80. Motorola Edge 30 Neo's body has the same thickness than the Google Pixel 3, but it's just a little heavier. The Google Pixel 3 features just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Google Pixel 3 counts with a bit better looking display than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2160px and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen. Motorola Edge 30 Neo shoots much clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same camera aperture and the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo also has higher video frame rate and a lot more mega pixels camera in the back.
Motorola Edge 30 Neo counts with a much bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has 64 GB more internal storage. Motorola Edge 30 Neo counts with a way better battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 4020mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.