Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| Android 12 | Android 5.0 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Aqua Foam, Black Onyx, Ice Palace and Very Peri | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| -- | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 418 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.33 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4020mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo has an overall score of 83.1, which is just a bit better than HTC One M9's 77.7 global score. The Motorola Edge 30 Neo body is incredibly newer, somewhat thinner and a little bit lighter than HTC One M9. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 30 Neo has a newer 12 version while HTC One M9 has Android 5.0, so it gives some additional features.
The HTC One M9 has a better looking screen than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because although it has a really smaller display and a little bit worse 1920 x 1080 resolution, it also counts with a little greater pixel density. The Motorola Edge 30 Neo has a superior storage for applications and games than HTC One M9, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
The HTC One M9 features a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64-bit CPU and an extra GPU. Motorola Edge 30 Neo has a superior battery duration than HTC One M9, because it has 4020mAh of battery capacity instead of 2840mAh.
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo features a superior camera than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same video quality, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo also has a back camera with a lot better 64 mega pixels resolution, a bigger aperture for better photos and videos in low light situations and higher video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.