Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 12 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2022-09-08 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Aqua Foam, Black Onyx, Ice Palace and Very Peri | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 418 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4020mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo has a global score of 83.1, which is a bit better than LG G7 ThinQ's overall score of 81. Both devices we are comparing work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 30 Neo has older 12 version while LG G7 ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie. The Motorola Edge 30 Neo is a just a little bit lighter cellphone than LG G7 ThinQ, but they are equally thin.
LG G7 ThinQ features a brighter display than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3120 resolution and a better pixels amount in each inch of screen. LG G7 ThinQ has just a bit better performance than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo captures slightly better photographs and videos than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos and video, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo also counts with a back facing camera with lot more megapixels and higher video frame rate.
LG G7 ThinQ features a superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Motorola Edge 30 Neo has greater battery performance than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 4020mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.