Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-09-08 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Aqua Foam, Black Onyx, Ice Palace and Very Peri | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 418 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4020mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo has an overall score of 83.1, which is just a bit better than LG V35 ThinQ's score of 81.3. The Motorola Edge 30 Neo construction is way newer and just a bit lighter, but a bit thicker than LG V35 ThinQ. The LG V35 ThinQ features just a little better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 30 Neo. They have 6 GB of RAM memory and 8 CPU cores.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit sharper screen than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution and more pixels per screen inch. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a superior storage to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB.
Motorola Edge 30 Neo shoots much clearer photos and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for taking pictures or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same video definition, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo also counts with a back camera with a way better resolution and higher 120 fps video frame rates.
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo has improved battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 4020mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.