Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-09-08 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Aqua Foam, Black Onyx, Ice Palace and Very Peri | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 418 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4020mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is slightly better than the Motorola Edge 30 Neo, getting a global score of 87.1 against 83.1. LG Velvet is a heavier cellphone than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, but both have the same thickness. The LG Velvet features a bit faster processing unit than Motorola Edge 30 Neo. They have the same number of cores and 6 GB of RAM memory.
LG Velvet and Motorola Edge 30 Neo count with similar screens, because although the LG Velvet has a bit worse screen pixel density, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2460px and a little bigger screen. The LG Velvet takes a bit better photos and videos than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because although it has a lot less MP resolution camera in the back, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the LG Velvet also counts with a much better video resolution.
The LG Velvet counts with a superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the LG Velvet also has an external SD slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. LG Velvet has just a little better battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity against 4020mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.