Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-09-08 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Aqua Foam, Black Onyx, Ice Palace and Very Peri | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 418 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4020mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 has a score of 83.8, which is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 30 Neo's 83.1 score. Galaxy A50's design is a little bit thinner than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, but it is a little heavier and was released many years before. Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a screen that's very similar to the screen in Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because although the Samsung Galaxy A50 has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a little inferior count of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen.
The Galaxy A50 features a much better storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A50 also has an external SD slot that allows up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A50 and Motorola Edge 30 Neo feature similar CPUs, and although the Samsung Galaxy A50 has lesser RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo and the Samsung Galaxy A50 both have really similar batteries duration, although the Samsung Galaxy A50 has a 0 percent lower battery capacity. The Motorola Edge 30 Neo captures much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light captures and videos, and they both have the same video definition, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo also counts with a back facing camera with lot more mega pixels and faster video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.