Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Aqua Foam, Black Onyx, Ice Palace and Very Peri | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 418 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4020mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 30 Neo, with an 85.5 score against 83.1. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A51 has 11 version and Motorola Edge 30 Neo has Android 12 version. Galaxy A51's body has the same thickness than the Motorola Edge 30 Neo, but it's just a little bit heavier.
Galaxy A51 and Motorola Edge 30 Neo have incredibly similar displays, because although the Galaxy A51 has a little bit lower amount of pixels per inch in the display, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a little bigger display. The Samsung Galaxy A51 has a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo and the Galaxy A51 feature really similar processors, and although the Galaxy A51 has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy A51 shoots a bit better photos and videos than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for capturing photographs or videos in low-light situations and a camera with a much worse 48 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a way higher video resolution.
Motorola Edge 30 Neo and Galaxy A51 both have quite similar battery performance, although the Galaxy A51 has a 0% smaller battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.