Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Aqua Foam, Black Onyx, Ice Palace and Very Peri | Prism cube black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 418 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4020mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 5G has an overall score of 90.8, which is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 30 Neo's 83.1 overall score. Both of these phones include Android OS, but Galaxy A51 5G has the previous 11 version while Motorola Edge 30 Neo has Android 12 version. Even though the Galaxy A51 5G is better than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, we must tell that it's also an a lot older, somewhat heavier and just a little bit thicker phone.
Galaxy A51 5G features a display that's just as good as the Motorola Edge 30 Neo one, because although the Galaxy A51 5G has a little worse display pixel density, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a bit larger display. The Galaxy A51 5G and Motorola Edge 30 Neo count with incredibly similar CPUs, both of them have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Galaxy A51 5G shoots slightly better photographs and videos than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because although it has a camera with lot less MP and a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for low-light photography, it also counts with a much better (4K) video definition. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a much bigger memory to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy A51 5G has a little longer battery performance than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because it has a 12% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.