Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Aqua Foam, Black Onyx, Ice Palace and Very Peri | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 418 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4020mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 30 Neo, having a general score of 91.3 against 83.1. Even being the best cellphone in this comparison review, it must be told that it's also an older, heavier and just a bit thicker cellphone. Both phones we compare here use the same Android 12 OS (operating system).
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G and Motorola Edge 30 Neo both feature similar displays, because although the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a just a little less pixels per display inch, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a little bit larger display. The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A52 5G also has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a processor that is very similar to the CPU in Motorola Edge 30 Neo, both have 6 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core CPU. The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a bit better camera than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture and a back facing camera with a 64 mega-pixels resolution, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with just a little better battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4020mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.