Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Aqua Foam, Black Onyx, Ice Palace and Very Peri | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 418 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4020mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52s is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 30 Neo, with a score of 91.1 against 83.1. Despite being the best we are comparing, Galaxy A52s's construction is older, heavier and just a little thicker than the Motorola Edge 30 Neo. Both devices we compare here have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A52s has an older 11 version and Motorola Edge 30 Neo has Android 12.
Galaxy A52s counts with a display that's just as good as the display in Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because although the Galaxy A52s has a little inferior quantity of pixels per display inch, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400px resolution, it also counts with a little bigger display. The Galaxy A52s has just a bit better processing power than Motorola Edge 30 Neo. Both have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores.
Galaxy A52s shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, and although they both have the same aperture and a 64 MP resolution back facing camera, the Galaxy A52s also has a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution. Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has a SD card slot that holds up to 1 TB.
The Galaxy A52s features just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because it has a 12 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.