Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Aqua Foam, Black Onyx, Ice Palace and Very Peri | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 418 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4020mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 30 Neo, having a score of 87.5 against 83.1. Samsung Galaxy A71 is an extremely older and somewhat heavier cellphone than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, but Samsung managed to make it just a bit thinner anyway. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A71 has an older 11 version and Motorola Edge 30 Neo has Android 12.
Motorola Edge 30 Neo and Samsung Galaxy A71 count with incredibly similar processors, both of them have the same number of cores and a 6 GB RAM memory. Motorola Edge 30 Neo has a bit sharper display than Galaxy A71, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400px resolution, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo also counts with a little bit greater quantity of pixels per inch in the display.
Samsung Galaxy A71 captures just a bit better videos and photos than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, and although they both have a 64 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera and the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A71 also has a much higher 3840x2160 video quality. The Galaxy A71 counts with a much better storage for games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy A71 also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy A71 features a bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 4020mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.