Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Aqua Foam, Black Onyx, Ice Palace and Very Peri | Prism bricks black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 418 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4020mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a global score of 92.9, which is much better than the Motorola Edge 30 Neo's overall score of 83.1. Both phones we are comparing work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has the previous 10 version and Motorola Edge 30 Neo has Android 12. Despite being the best we are comparing, Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a noticeably older, just a little thicker and somewhat heavier phone than the Motorola Edge 30 Neo.
Galaxy A71 5G UW features a display that's very similar to the Motorola Edge 30 Neo one, because although the Galaxy A71 5G UW has a bit lower display pixel density, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a bit bigger display. Galaxy A71 5G UW has just a bit better processing power than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a much better memory for applications and games than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has an external memory slot that allows up to 1000 GB. Galaxy A71 5G UW features a slightly better camera than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, and although they both have a 64 MP resolution back camera and a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a way better 3840x2160 video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a bit superior battery life than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 4020mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.