Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2020-10-16 |
| 6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Aqua Foam, Black Onyx, Ice Palace and Very Peri | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 418 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4020mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F41 is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, having a score of 85.2 against 83.1. Even being the best in our current comparison, we must highlight that it's also older, somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy F41 has the older 11 version while Motorola Edge 30 Neo has Android 12 version.
Samsung Galaxy F41 counts with a bit more powerful processor than Motorola Edge 30 Neo. Both of them have 8 CPU cores and the same RAM memory amount. The Samsung Galaxy F41 counts with a little sharper screen than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because although it has a little bit inferior pixel count in each inch of screen and a bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a quite larger display.
The Samsung Galaxy F41 has a bigger storage to install games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy F41 features a really longer battery life than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity instead of 4020mAh.
Galaxy F41 has just a bit better camera than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, and although they both have a same resolution back camera and a same size diafragm aperture, the Galaxy F41 also has a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.