Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 84.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2020-03-23 |
| 6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Aqua Foam, Black Onyx, Ice Palace and Very Peri | Midnight blue and Raven black |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 418 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4020mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M21 is a bit better than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, getting a overall score of 84.1 against 83.1. Both devices we compare here include Android OS, but the Galaxy M21 has an older 11 version while Motorola Edge 30 Neo has Android 12. Although it's the best we are comparing here, the Galaxy M21 design is noticeably older, somewhat thicker and heavier than the Motorola Edge 30 Neo.
Galaxy M21's processing unit is just as good as Motorola Edge 30 Neo's CPU, and although the Galaxy M21 has 2 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Galaxy M21 has just a bit better looking display than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because although it has a just a little inferior amount of pixels per inch of screen and a quite lower 1080 x 2340px resolution, it also counts with a quite bigger display.
The Samsung Galaxy M21 counts with more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy M21 counts with just a bit better camera than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for taking photos or videos in low light situations and a much lower resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a lot better (4K) video quality.
Galaxy M21 counts with a very superior battery life than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.