Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-09-08 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Aqua Foam, Black Onyx, Ice Palace and Very Peri | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 418 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4020mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 30 Neo, with a global score of 90.8 against 83.1. Even being the best cellphone in this comparison review, the Galaxy Note 20 is an extremely older, noticeably heavier and just a bit thicker cellphone than Motorola Edge 30 Neo. Galaxy Note 20 has a bit better processing power than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Note 20 also has a larger amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a screen that's just as good as Motorola Edge 30 Neo's display, because although the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a bit lower pixel density, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a little bit bigger display. The Galaxy Note 20 and Motorola Edge 30 Neo have incredibly similar memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos, they have equal internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features just a bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity. The Motorola Edge 30 Neo features a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have the same video quality and the same camera aperture, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo also has better 120 fps video frame rates and a back camera with a much higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.