Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Aqua Foam, Black Onyx, Ice Palace and Very Peri | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 418 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4020mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is better than the Motorola Edge 30 Neo, having a score of 98.9 against 83.1. Even being the best in this comparison, Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a way older, a little thicker and heavier cellphone than the Motorola Edge 30 Neo. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a newer 13 version and Motorola Edge 30 Neo has Android 12 version, giving you a couple additional features and improved performance.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit superior processing unit than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit better looking screen than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because it has a bit larger display, a better 1440 x 3088 resolution and a little more pixels per screen inch.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a way better camera than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, and although they both have the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a way better 7680x4320 video quality and a lot higher 108 mega pixels resolution camera in the back. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has much more storage for applications and games than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1000 GB.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a little better battery life than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because it has a 12 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.