Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Aqua Foam, Black Onyx, Ice Palace and Very Peri | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 418 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4020mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 30 Neo is a little bit better than the Galaxy Note 3, getting a general score of 83.1 against 81.2. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 30 Neo has newer 12 version while Galaxy Note 3 has Android 5.0, counting with lots of additional features. The Motorola Edge 30 Neo is a noticeably newer phone, and it's also just a little lighter and a bit thinner than the Galaxy Note 3.
The Galaxy Note 3 features a little bit better looking display than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, although it has a little less pixels per screen inch, a quite smaller display and a bit worse 1920 x 1080 resolution. Galaxy Note 3 and Motorola Edge 30 Neo feature extremely similar processing units, because although the Galaxy Note 3 has 4 less cpu cores and less RAM, it also counts with a graphics processor.
Motorola Edge 30 Neo has a bit more storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory. The Motorola Edge 30 Neo features improved battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 3, because it has 4020mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo captures much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo also has a lot more MP camera, a bigger diafragm aperture for better photos in low-light situations and higher 120 frames per second video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.