Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 5.1 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Aqua Foam, Black Onyx, Ice Palace and Very Peri | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| -- | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 418 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4020mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy Note 5, having an 83.1 score against 79.3. Both phones in this review include Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 30 Neo has the newer 12 version while Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1, counting with a couple nice extra features. Motorola Edge 30 Neo's body is notably newer and just a little lighter than Samsung Galaxy Note 5's, but it is also just a bit thicker.
Galaxy Note 5 has a much better screen than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little greater display density and a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution. The Motorola Edge 30 Neo has a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy Note 5, because it has more RAM memory and a higher number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo counts with a superior camera than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo also has a larger camera aperture, better 120 frames per second video frame rates and a back-facing camera with a much higher 64 mega-pixels resolution.
Motorola Edge 30 Neo has a much greater memory to install applications and games than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 128 GB internal memory. Motorola Edge 30 Neo has improved battery performance than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 4020mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.