Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-09-08 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Aqua Foam, Black Onyx, Ice Palace and Very Peri | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 418 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4020mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 has a general score of 89, which is a bit better than Motorola Edge 30 Neo's 83.1 global score. The Galaxy Note10 design has the same thickness than the Motorola Edge 30 Neo, but it is just a little bit heavier. Galaxy Note10 has a display that's just as good as the Motorola Edge 30 Neo one, and although the Galaxy Note10 has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2280 and a quite worse pixels count in each inch in the screen, they both have a display with the same size.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 features a way bigger memory to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because it has 256 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 features a little faster CPU than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo counts with a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy Note10, because it has a 4020mAh battery capacity against 3500mAh. Motorola Edge 30 Neo has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for capturing photographs or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo also counts with faster 120 fps video frame rates and a lot better resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.