Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-09-08 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Aqua Foam, Black Onyx, Ice Palace and Very Peri | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 418 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4020mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e has a score of 86.3, which is a bit better than Motorola Edge 30 Neo's overall score of 83.1. The Galaxy S10e design has the same thickness than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, but it is a little bit lighter. The Samsung Galaxy S10e has a bit better processor than Motorola Edge 30 Neo. Both of them have 6 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores.
The Galaxy S10e counts with just a bit better looking screen than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a bit lower 1080 x 2280 pixels resolution, it also counts with a quite greater pixels amount per inch of display. The Motorola Edge 30 Neo takes much better videos and photos than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo also counts with better 120 frames per second video frame rates and a back camera with a much higher 64 MP resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a way bigger memory to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has an external memory slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Motorola Edge 30 Neo has superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a 4020mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.