Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Aqua Foam, Black Onyx, Ice Palace and Very Peri | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 418 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4020mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 has a score of 94.8, which is much better than Motorola Edge 30 Neo's 83.1 general score. Samsung Galaxy S20's design has the same thickness than the Motorola Edge 30 Neo, but it's just a little heavier. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S20 has the newer 13 version and Motorola Edge 30 Neo has Android 12, so it counts with a lot of extra features.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 features a bit better CPU than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy S20 has a little more vivid screen than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels number in each inch of display and a higher 1440 x 3200 resolution.
Galaxy S20 counts with much more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy S20 also has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy S20 counts with a battery lifetime that's just as good as the Motorola Edge 30 Neo one, although the Galaxy S20 has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4020mAh.
Motorola Edge 30 Neo counts with a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S20, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture and the same (Full HD) video quality, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo also has faster video frame rates and a back facing camera with way more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.