Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Aqua Foam, Black Onyx, Ice Palace and Very Peri | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 418 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4020mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than the Motorola Edge 30 Neo, having a general score of 98 against 83.1. Even being the best phone in our current comparison, we must tell that it is also way older, thicker and extremely heavier. These devices work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a more recent 13 version and Motorola Edge 30 Neo has Android 12 version, so it offers a couple nice extra features and optimized performance.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bit faster processor than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit better display than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because it has a little larger display, a just a little better pixel count in each display inch and a higher 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has greater battery life than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4020mAh.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures much clearer photographs and videos than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, and although they both have the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a back camera with a much better 108 mega pixels resolution and a way better video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.