Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Aqua Foam, Black Onyx, Ice Palace and Very Peri | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 418 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4020mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than the Motorola Edge 30 Neo, with a general score of 95.4 against 83.1. Even being the best we are comparing, we must note that it is also somewhat thicker and noticeably heavier. Both phones in our current comparison have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has the newer 13 version while Motorola Edge 30 Neo has Android 12 version.
Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much better display than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because it has a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution, a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display and a little bit larger display. The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a little better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has more RAM.
Motorola Edge 30 Neo and Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra have similar storage to store more apps and games, they have equal internal storage. Galaxy S22 Ultra features a way better camera than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a much better 7680x4320 video resolution and a back camera with lot more megapixels.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has superior battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because it has a 24% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.