Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Aqua Foam, Black Onyx, Ice Palace and Very Peri | Blue and Red |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 418 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.33 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 10.6 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4020mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo has an overall score of 83.1, which is a little bit better than Galaxy S5 Sport's 77.8 global score. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 30 Neo has the older 12 version and Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2 version. The Motorola Edge 30 Neo is a much newer device, and it's also somewhat thinner and just a little lighter than the Galaxy S5 Sport.
Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport features a better looking display than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a little smaller display, it also counts with a just a little greater pixel density. The Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a bit better processing unit than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and 4 less cores , it also counts with an additional graphics co-processor.
Motorola Edge 30 Neo captures much better videos and photos than Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video quality, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo also has a back-facing camera with a much higher 64 MP resolution, better video frame rate and a larger aperture to take better photos in low-light situations.
Motorola Edge 30 Neo has a very superior memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 30 Neo features a much better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 4020mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.