Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-09-08 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Aqua Foam, Black Onyx, Ice Palace and Very Peri | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 418 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4020mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy S7, with a overall score of 83.1 against 79.5. Motorola Edge 30 Neo's construction has the same thickness than Samsung Galaxy S7, but it is just a bit heavier. Galaxy S7 has a more vivid display than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution.
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo counts with just a bit better processing power than Galaxy S7, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and 4 more cores. Motorola Edge 30 Neo shoots much better videos and photos than Galaxy S7, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for taking pictures or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo also counts with a camera in the back with a much better resolution and better video frame rate.
Motorola Edge 30 Neo has more storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 30 Neo has better battery performance than Galaxy S7, because it has a 4020mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.