Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2022-09-08 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Aqua Foam, Black Onyx, Ice Palace and Very Peri | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 418 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4020mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 30 Neo is slightly better than the Galaxy S7 edge, having an 83.1 score against 78.1. Although Motorola Edge 30 Neo is just a little bit thicker than the Galaxy S7 edge, it's a little lighter and also extremely newer. These devices include Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 30 Neo has the older 12 version while Galaxy S7 edge has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo features a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has more RAM and 4 more 2.2 gigahertz cpu cores. The Galaxy S7 edge counts with a little sharper display than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560px resolution and a higher screen pixel density.
Motorola Edge 30 Neo counts with a greater storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 30 Neo counts with just a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a 4020mAh battery capacity instead of 3600mAh.
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo captures much better pictures and videos than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo also counts with a camera in the back with much more MP and faster 120 frames per second video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.