Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-09-08 | 2017-04-21 |
| 6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Aqua Foam, Black Onyx, Ice Palace and Very Peri | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 418 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4020mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy S8, having a score of 83.1 against 81.7. Motorola Edge 30 Neo's construction has the same thickness and weight than Samsung Galaxy S8. Galaxy S8's processor is just as good as Motorola Edge 30 Neo's processing unit, and although the Galaxy S8 has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
Galaxy S8 has a bit better looking display than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2960 resolution and a higher display pixels density. The Galaxy S8 features just a bit bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 256 GB.
Motorola Edge 30 Neo counts with better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S8, because it has a 34 percent bigger battery capacity. The Motorola Edge 30 Neo shoots much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy S8, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light captures and videos, and they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo also counts with a back facing camera with a way higher 64 mega-pixels resolution and higher 120 frames per second video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.