Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-09-08 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Aqua Foam, Black Onyx, Ice Palace and Very Peri | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 418 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4020mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S9 is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 30 Neo, having a overall score of 83.3 against 83.1. Although it's the best in this review, the Galaxy S9 is a noticeably older, just a little bit thicker and a little bit heavier device than the Motorola Edge 30 Neo. The Galaxy S9 has a little better processing power than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy S9 has a little bit better looking display than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2960 pixels resolution and a higher screen density. The Motorola Edge 30 Neo features a better camera than Galaxy S9, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video quality, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo also counts with a back facing camera with a way better resolution and higher 120 frames per second video frame rates.
Galaxy S9 features a bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds up to 400 GB. Motorola Edge 30 Neo features greater battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has 4020mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.