Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Aqua Foam, Black Onyx, Ice Palace and Very Peri | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 418 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4020mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a global score of 88.5, which is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 30 Neo's overall score of 83.1. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a much older and somewhat heavier phone than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, but Samsung was able to build it just a bit thinner anyway. Both phones in this comparison use the same Android 12 OS (operating system).
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit sharper screen than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because it has a bit better display pixels density, a bit larger display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy Z Flip features a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because it has 256 GB internal storage. The Motorola Edge 30 Neo counts with greater battery life than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 4020mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo features a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video definition and the same diafragm aperture, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo also has better 120 frames per second video frame rates and a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.