Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Aqua Foam, Black Onyx, Ice Palace and Very Peri | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 418 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4020mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an overall score of 92.3, which is better than the Motorola Edge 30 Neo's 83.1 global score. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has 11 version while Motorola Edge 30 Neo has Android 12 version. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G construction is just a bit thinner than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, but it's heavier and was released 2 years before.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a slightly better screen than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because it has a just a little more pixels per inch of display, a quite bigger screen and a slightly higher 1080 x 2636 resolution. Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a little bit better performance than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a larger amount of RAM.
Motorola Edge 30 Neo features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have the same aperture and the same video definition, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo also has better video frame rates and a back-facing camera with a lot higher 64 megapixels resolution. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a way bigger storage for applications and games than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo has better battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 4020mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.