Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-09-08 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.00 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Interstellar Black and Starlight White | Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1250 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.96 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 XL is a bit better than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, with an 82.5 score against 80.9. Google Pixel 2 XL's construction is just a little thinner and somewhat lighter than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, although it was released 5 years before. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has just a bit better looking screen than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a lot worse pixels density and a way worse 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, it also counts with a bit larger display.
Google Pixel 2 XL has a very superior CPU than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with more processing cores. The Google Pixel 2 XL and Motorola Edge 30 Ultra count with extremely similar storage capacity for games and applications, both of them have the same internal storage.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a way better camera than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a camera in the back with way more MP, a much better video definition and a lot bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a way better battery life than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3520mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.