Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-09-08 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.00 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Interstellar Black and Starlight White | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 1250 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.96 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a global score of 80.9, which is slightly better than the Google Pixel 3a's 78.8 global score. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra construction is a lot newer than Google Pixel 3a's, but it is noticeably heavier and just a little thicker. Both devices in our current comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a more recent 12 version and Google Pixel 3a has Android 11 version, so it counts with some extra features and performance enhancements.
Google Pixel 3a has a much greater processing power than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has 4 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with more CPU cores. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a bit worse screen pixels density, it also counts with a larger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra takes a lot better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for taking pictures in low light environments, it also counts with a much better video definition, a much larger sensor shooting way better quality videos and photos and a back camera with a lot better 200 megapixels resolution.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a way bigger storage to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, because it has more internal memory. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 67 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.