Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-09-08 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.00 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Interstellar Black and Starlight White | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 1250 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.96 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has an overall score of 80.9, which is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 3a XL's 78.9 general score. Although the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra is a lot newer than the Google Pixel 3a XL, it is a bit thicker and somewhat heavier. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a more recent 12 version and Google Pixel 3a XL has Android 11, so it gives some additional features and optimized performance.
The Google Pixel 3a XL counts with a very superior processing unit than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has lesser RAM, it also counts with 7 more CPU cores. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a much better looking screen than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a little bit worse pixel amount in each screen inch, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a bit larger display.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a superior memory for apps and games than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 64 GB more internal memory. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra captures a lot better videos and photos than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a lot bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition and a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.