Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-09-08 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.00 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Interstellar Black and Starlight White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| 1250 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.96 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 is slightly better than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, with a overall score of 81.9 against 80.9. The Google Pixel 4 design is somewhat lighter and just a little bit thinner than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, even though it was released many years before. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a slightly better looking display than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a bit inferior pixels amount per inch in the screen, it also counts with a larger screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a very superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity. The Google Pixel 4 has a much better performance than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with 7 more processing cores.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a way better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 79% more battery size. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra captures way better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a much more megapixels camera in the back, a way better 7680x4320 video quality and a much larger camera sensor which offers a way higher image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.