Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.00 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Interstellar Black and Starlight White | Just black |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 1250 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 14.96 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a is slightly better than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, with an 82.9 score against 80.9. Despite of the fact that the Google Pixel 4a is extremely older than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, it's body is just a bit thinner and much lighter. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS (operating system), but Google Pixel 4a has the older 11 version while Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has Android 12 version.
The Google Pixel 4a has a much better performing processing unit than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a larger number of cores. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a slightly better looking screen than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a just a bit worse pixel density, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bigger display.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra takes much better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for low-light captures, it also counts with a much more MP back camera, a much bigger back camera sensor capturing lot better quality photographs and videos and a much higher video definition.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra and Google Pixel 4a both count with incredibly similar storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos, they have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a superior battery duration than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 59 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.