Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-09-08 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.00 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Interstellar Black and Starlight White | Just black and Sorta sage |
| -- | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| 1250 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 14.96 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 is better than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, with a general score of 89 against 80.9. The Google Pixel 5 body is a little thinner and much lighter than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, despite of the fact that it was released just 23 months before. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a little more vivid screen than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a little bit worse pixel number per inch in the display, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a little bit bigger display.
The Google Pixel 5 counts with a really superior processing power than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, and although they both have 8 GB of RAM memory, the Google Pixel 5 also has a larger number of cores. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra shoots much better videos and photos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a camera with way more MP, a much better video resolution and a way bigger camera sensor.
The Google Pixel 5 has as much memory capacity to install games and applications as Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, they have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 5, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4080mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.