Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| Android 12 | Android 5.0 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.00 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Interstellar Black and Starlight White | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| -- | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 1250 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.9 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 14.96 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a global score of 80.9, which is a bit better than HTC One M9's global score of 77.7. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has the newer 12 version and HTC One M9 has Android 5.0 version, providing a lot of extra features and improved performance. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra is a much newer and somewhat thinner phone than the HTC One M9, although it is heavier.
The HTC One M9 features a little sharper screen than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has a lot smaller display and a little bit worse 1920 x 1080px resolution, it also counts with a little bit higher pixel amount in each display inch. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a much better storage capacity for apps and games than HTC One M9, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
HTC One M9 counts with a much greater performance than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with 7 more processing cores, a 64 bits CPU and a GPU. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a really longer battery performance than HTC One M9, because it has a 76 percent larger battery capacity.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra captures much clearer videos and photos than HTC One M9, because it has a way higher video definition, a lot more MP back camera, a way larger back camera sensor and a larger aperture to capture better low light images and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.