Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-09-08 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.00 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Interstellar Black and Starlight White | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1250 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 14.96 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a score of 80.9, which is a bit better than HTC U Ultra's 77 general score. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra is a way newer cellphone than HTC U Ultra, but it's somewhat heavier and a bit thicker. HTC U Ultra features a much better processing power than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has less RAM, it also counts with a larger number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a slightly better display than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a little lower pixel density and a bit lower 1080 x 2400px resolution, it also counts with a bigger screen. HTC U Ultra has a very superior storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a really longer battery performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 67% greater battery size. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a way better camera than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low light photography, it also counts with a lot better video quality, a camera in the back with a much higher 200 megapixels resolution and a lot larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.