Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-09-08 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.00 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Interstellar Black and Starlight White | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1250 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 14.96 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a score of 81.3, which is a bit better than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra's global score of 80.9. LG V35 ThinQ is an notably older phone than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, but LG managed to build it thinner and incredibly lighter. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much more powerful processor than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a higher number of cores (and faster).
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with just a bit better looking screen than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a way worse 1080 x 2400 resolution and a way lower display density, it also counts with a little larger screen. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra shoots much clearer videos and photos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for capturing pictures in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a lot higher 200 megapixels resolution camera in the back and a way larger sensor taking lot higher quality photographs and videos.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with much more memory for applications and games than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a way better battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.