Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-09-08 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.00 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Interstellar Black and Starlight White | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 1250 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 14.96 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, getting a global score of 87.1 against 80.9. Despite of the fact that LG Velvet is much older than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, it's body is a little thinner and just a little lighter. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a bit better display than LG Velvet, although it has a little bit smaller screen, a little lower screen density and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400.
The LG Velvet has much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, and although they both have equal internal storage, the LG Velvet also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. LG Velvet has a very superior performance than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a larger number of faster cores.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra takes much clearer videos and photos than LG Velvet, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a back camera with much more MP, a lot better 7680x4320 video quality and a much larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a lot better image and video quality.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features longer battery lifetime than LG Velvet, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.