Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-09-08 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.00 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Interstellar Black and Starlight White | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 1250 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 14.96 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra is slightly better than the Motorola One Hyper, with an 80.9 score against 79.8. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has newer 12 version and Motorola One Hyper has Android 11, so it offers some nice extra features and optimized performance. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra's construction is much newer, just a little thinner and a little bit lighter than the Motorola One Hyper.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a more vivid display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a just a bit inferior pixels amount in each inch in the display, it also counts with a quite larger screen and a bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution. The Motorola One Hyper has an extremely better processing unit than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has lesser RAM, it also counts with a higher number of cores.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra takes much better pictures and videos than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra also has a way better video quality and a back facing camera with a much better resolution. The Motorola One Hyper counts with a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Motorola One Hyper also has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with improved battery performance than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.