Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-09-08 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.00 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Interstellar Black and Starlight White | Blue and Brown |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 1250 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 14.96 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra is a bit better than Motorola One Vision, with an 80.9 score against 80.7. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra body is way newer and just a little bit thinner, but also a little heavier than the Motorola One Vision. The Motorola One Vision has a much powerful processor than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has less RAM memory, it also counts with a higher number of cores (and also faster).
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a bit sharper display than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little bit worse quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a quite bigger screen. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a greater camera than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low light photos and video, it also counts with a much higher 200 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, a lot better video resolution and a much bigger back camera sensor taking way better quality photos and videos.
The Motorola One Vision features much more memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Motorola One Vision also has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a way better battery performance than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.